

شنیدن و نگهداشتن این اپیزود
پخش را شروع کن؛ هنگام رفتن به صفحههای دیگر هم ادامه پیدا میکند.
برای خواندن و مرور دوباره
گفتوگو را به متن همراهت تبدیل کن
متن کامل و خوانای این اپیزود در Word و PDF، همراه با نقشهٔ تصویری موضوعات.
کتابخانه و بازخورد
برای شناخت بهتر پیش از شنیدن
این اپیزود هنوز بررسی عمیق نشده است
در اپیزودهای بررسیشده، پادگرد خلاصه، محورهای گفتگو، فصلهای قابل پخش و پرسشهای مهم را از متن اپیزود استخراج میکند.
تحلیل این اپیزودتکمیل این اپیزود
اگر مهمان یا اسپانسری جا افتاده، از فهرست موجود انتخاب کن یا نام تازهای پیشنهاد بده. پیشنهادها بعد از بررسی مدیر عمومی میشوند.
متن منتشرشده توسط پادکستر
توضیحات اپیزود
THE SMARTER THEY ARE, THE HARDER THEY FAIL Mental horsepower doesn’t guarantee mental dexterity. No matter how much brainpower you have, if you lack the motivation to change your mind, you’ll miss many occasions to think again. Research reveals that the higher you score on an IQ test, the more likely you are to fall for stereotypes, because you’re faster at recognizing patterns. And recent experiments suggest that the smarter you are, the more you might struggle to update your beliefs. One study investigated whether being a math whiz makes you better at analyzing data. The answer is yes—if you’re told the data are about something bland, like a treatment for skin rashes. But what if the exact same data are labeled as focusing on an ideological issue that activates strong emotions—like gun laws in the United States? Being a quant jock makes you more accurate in interpreting the results—as long as they support your beliefs. Yet if the empirical pattern clashes with your ideology, math prowess is no longer an asset; it actually becomes a liability. The better you are at crunching numbers, the more spectacularly you fail at analyzing patterns that contradict your views. If they were liberals, math geniuses did worse than their peers at evaluating evidence that gun bans failed. If they were conservatives, they did worse at assessing evidence that gun bans worked. In psychology there are at least two biases that drive this pattern. One is confirmation bias: seeing what we expect to see. The other is desirability bias: seeing what we want to see. These biases don’t just prevent us from applying our intelligence. They can actually contort our intelligence into a weapon against the truth. We find reasons to preach our faith more deeply, prosecute our case more passionately, and ride the tidal wave of our political party. The tragedy is that we’re usually unaware of the resulting flaws in our thinking. My favorite bias is the “I’m not biased” bias, in which people believe they’re more objective than others. It turns out that smart people are more likely to fall into this trap. The brighter you are, the harder it can be to see your own limitations. Being good at thinking can make you worse at rethinking. When we’re in scientist mode, we refuse to let our ideas become ideologies. We don’t start with answers or solutions; we lead with questions and puzzles. We don’t preach from intuition; we teach from evidence. We don’t just have healthy skepticism about other people’s arguments; we dare to disagree with our own arguments. Thinking like a scientist involves more than just reacting with an open mind. It means being actively open-minded. It requires searching for reasons why we might be wrong—not for reasons why we must be right—and revising our views based on what we learn. کانال خلاصه کتاب (https://t.me/luminous_bookclub) کانال موزیک (https://t.me/luminous_music) کانال مکالمات روزمره (https://t.me/foroughpapi) پیج اینستاگرام: Luminous__english Castbox channel: luminous english 📚هایلایت قسمت 15 کتاب Think Again ✅ horsepower: اسب بخار ✅ dexterity : مهارت ✅ brainpower : قدرت ✅ occasion : مناسبت، فرصت ✅ stereotypes : کلیشه ها ✅ struggle : کشمکش ✅ investigate: بررسی کردن ✅ treatment : درمان ✅ exact: دقیق ✅ label: نامگذاری کردن ✅ ideological : ایدئولوژیکی ✅ quant jock: تحلیلگر کمی ✅ accurate : دقیق ✅ interpreting : تفسیر کردن ✅ empirical : تجربی ✅ prowess: مهارت ✅ asset: چیز مفید و به درد بخور ✅ liability : مسئولیت ✅ crunching : پردازش ✅ spectacularly: به طور چشمگیری ✅ contradict: نقض کردن ✅ geniuses : نوابغ ✅ peer: همتا، هم درجه ✅ evaluating : ارزیابی کردن ✅ conservative : محافظه کار ✅ confirmation : تایید ✅ bias : سوگیری ✅ desirability bias : سوگیری مطلوبیت ✅ intelligence : هوش ✅ contort: تغییر شکل دادن ✅ weapon : اسلحه ✅ prosecute: محاکمه کردن ✅ passionately : با شور و اشتیاق ✅ tragedy : تراژدی ✅ unaware : بی اطلاع ✅ objective : بی طرف ✅ brighter: باهوش تر ✅ limitation: محدودیت ✅ preach: موعظه کردن ✅ intuition : شهود ✅ skepticism : بد بینی ✅ involve: مستلزم بودن ✅ revising: اصلاح کردن ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
نظرها
هنوز نظری نوشته نشده.


