

شنیدن و نگهداشتن این اپیزود
پخش را شروع کن؛ هنگام رفتن به صفحههای دیگر هم ادامه پیدا میکند.
برای خواندن و مرور دوباره
گفتوگو را به متن همراهت تبدیل کن
متن کامل و خوانای این اپیزود در Word و PDF، همراه با نقشهٔ تصویری موضوعات.
کتابخانه و بازخورد
برای شناخت بهتر پیش از شنیدن
این اپیزود هنوز بررسی عمیق نشده است
در اپیزودهای بررسیشده، پادگرد خلاصه، محورهای گفتگو، فصلهای قابل پخش و پرسشهای مهم را از متن اپیزود استخراج میکند.
تحلیل این اپیزودتکمیل این اپیزود
اگر مهمان یا اسپانسری جا افتاده، از فهرست موجود انتخاب کن یا نام تازهای پیشنهاد بده. پیشنهادها بعد از بررسی مدیر عمومی میشوند.
متن منتشرشده توسط پادکستر
توضیحات اپیزود
When students arrived for the debate, they discovered that their sparring partner was not a peer but a law student. What they didn’t know was that the law student was in cahoots with the research team: his task was to spend eighteen minutes launching an aggressive assault on their worldviews. Murray called it a “stressful interpersonal disputation,” having directed the law student to make the participants angry and anxious with a “mode of attack” that was “vehement, sweeping, and personally abusive.” The poor students sweated and shouted as they struggled to defend their ideals. The pain didn’t stop there. In the weeks that followed, the students were invited back to the lab to discuss the films of their own interactions. They watched themselves grimacing and stringing together incoherent sentences. All in all, they spent about eight hours reliving those humiliating eighteen minutes. A quarter century later, when the participants reflected on the experience, it was clear that many had found it agonizing. Drill described feeling “unabating rage.” Locust recalled his bewilderment, anger, chagrin, and discomfort. “They have deceived me, telling me there was going to be a discussion, when in fact there was an attack,” he wrote. “How could they have done this to me; what is the point of this?” Other participants had a strikingly different response: they actually seemed to get a kick out of being forced to rethink their beliefs. “Some may have found the experience mildly discomforting, in that their cherished (and in my case, at least, sophomoric) philosophies were challenged in an aggressive manner,” one participant remembers. “But it was hardly an experience that would blight one for a week, let alone a life.” Another described the whole series of events as “highly agreeable.” A third went so far as to call it “fun.” Ever since I first read about the participants who reacted enthusiastically, I’ve been fascinated by what made them tick. How did they manage to enjoy the experience of having their beliefs eviscerated—and how can the rest of us learn to do the same? کانال خلاصه کتاب (https://t.me/luminous_bookclub) کانال موزیک (https://t.me/luminous_music) کانال مکالمات روزمره (https://t.me/foroughpapi) پیج اینستاگرام: Luminous__english Castbox channel: luminous english 📚هایلایت قسمت ۳۵ کتاب Think Again ✅ debate : مناظره ✅ discover: کشف کردن ✅ sparring partner : حریف تمرینی ✅ cahoot: تبانی ✅ aggressive assault: حمله تند ✅ worldview : جهانبینی ✅ interpersonal : بین فردی ✅ disputation : نزاع ✅ participant: شرکت کننده ✅ anxious : مضطرب ✅ vehement: شدید ✅ sweeping : فراگیر، تند ✅ abusive : توهین آمیز ✅ sweat: عرق ریختن ✅ defend : دفاع کردن ✅ interaction : تعامل ✅ grimace: اخم و تخم کردن ✅ stringing together : بهم بافتن ✅ incoherent : نا مربوط ✅ agonizing : دردناک ✅ describe : توصیف کردن ✅ unabating : بی وقفه ✅ bewilderment : گیجی ✅ anger: عصبانیت ✅ chagrin : اندوه ✅ discomfort : معذب بودن ✅ strikingly : بطور چشمگیر ✅ response : پاسخ ✅ cherished : محبوب ✅ sophomoric : سال دومی ✅ highly agreeable : کاملا قابل پذیرش ✅ enthusiastically : مشتاقانه ✅ eviscerate: تهی کردن ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
نظرها
هنوز نظری نوشته نشده.


