Think Again-Day65

تکمیل این اپیزود

اگر مهمان یا اسپانسری جا افتاده، از فهرست موجود انتخاب کن یا نام تازه‌ای پیشنهاد بده. پیشنهادها بعد از بررسی مدیر عمومی می‌شوند.

متن منتشرشده توسط پادکستر

توضیحات اپیزود

Going into the debate, 92 percent of the audience has already made up their minds. I’m one of them: it didn’t take me long to figure out where I stood on preschool subsidies. In the United States, public education is free from kindergarten through high school. I’m familiar with evidence that early access to education in the first few years of children’s lives may be even more critical to helping them escape poverty than anything they learn later. I believe education is a fundamental human right, like access to water, food, shelter, and health care. That puts me on Team Debra. As I watch the debate, her early arguments strike a chord. Here are some highlights: Debra : Research clearly shows that a good preschool can help kids overcome the disadvantages often associated with poverty. Data for the win! Be still, my beating heart. Debra : You will possibly hear my opponent talk today about different priorities . . . he might say that subsidies are needed, but not for preschools. I would like to ask you, Mr. Natarajan . . . why don’t we examine the evidence and the data and decide accordingly? If Harish has an Achilles’ heel, my former student has told me, it’s that his brilliant arguments aren’t always grounded in facts. Harish : Let me start by examining the main claim . . . that if we believe preschools are good in principle, surely it is worth giving money to subsidize those—but I don’t think that is ever enough of a justification for subsidies. Debra has clearly done her homework. She didn’t just nail Harish on data—she anticipated his counterargument. Debra : The state budget is a big one, and there is room in it to subsidize preschools and invest in other fields. Therefore, the idea that there are more important things to spend on is irrelevant, because the different subsidies are not mutually exclusive. Way to debunk Harish’s case for trade-offs. Bravo. Harish : Maybe the state has the budget to do all the good things. Maybe the state has the budget to provide health care. Maybe it has the budget to provide welfare payments. Maybe it has the budget to provide running water as well as preschool. I would love to live in that world, but I don’t think that is the world we live in. I think we live in a world where there are real constraints on what governments can spend money on—and even if those are not real, those are nonetheless political. D’oh! Valid point. Even if a program has the potential to pay for itself, it takes a lot of political capital to make it happen—capital that could be invested elsewhere. کانال خلاصه کتاب (https://t.me/luminous_bookclub) کانال موزیک (https://t.me/luminous_music) کانال مکالمات روزمره (https://t.me/foroughpapi) #think_day65 📱 پیج اینستاگرام: Luminous__english Castbox channel: luminous english 📚هایلایت قسمت 65 کتاب Think Again ✅ Make up one’s mind: To decide something, تصمیم گرفتن ✅ Figure out: To understand or find the answer, فهمیدن / حل کردن ✅ Stand on (something): To have a clear opinion or position about something, نظر داشتن در مورد چیزی ✅ Subsidy / Subsidize: Financial support from the government, یارانه / یارانه دادن ✅ Be familiar with: To know or recognize something, آشنا بودن با ✅ Access to (something): The ability or right to use or enter, دسترسی به ✅ Escape poverty: To get out of a poor condition, رهایی از فقر ✅ Fundamental human right: A basic right that every person should have, حق بنیادین انسانی ✅ Strike a chord: To cause someone to feel sympathy or agreement, در دل نشستن / تأثیر گذاشتن ✅ Highlight: The most important or memorable part, نکته یا بخش مهم ✅ Overcome disadvantages: To successfully deal with difficulties, غلبه بر نواقص یا مشکلات ✅ Associated with: Connected to, مرتبط با ✅ For the win!: (informal, humorous) Used to show strong support or excitement, برای پیروزی! / عالیه! ✅ Be still, my beating heart: (idiomatic, humorous) Used to express excitement or admiration, وای چه هیجان‌انگیز! / وای دلم! ✅ Opponent: A person you compete or argue against, رقیب / طرف مقابل ✅ Examine the evidence: To carefully look at facts or data, بررسی شواهد ✅ Accordingly: In a way that matches the situation, مطابق آن / بر این اساس ✅ Achilles’ heel: A weak point in an otherwise strong person or system, نقطه ضعف ✅ Grounded in facts: Based on real evidence or truth, مبتنی بر واقعیت ✅ Do one’s homework: To prepare carefully or research before doing something, تحقیق و آمادگی کامل داشتن ✅ Nail (someone) on something: To catch or defeat someone with strong evidence, محکوم کردن / شکست دادن با مدرک ✅ Anticipate (someone’s argument): To predict what someone will say and prepare for it, پیش‌بینی کردن حرف یا استدلال طرف مقابل ✅ Mutually exclusive: Not able to happen or exist at the same time, متضاد / ناسازگار ✅ Debunk (an idea or argument): To show that something is false or exaggerated, افشا کردن / رد کردن ✅ Trade-off: A situation where you give up one thing to gain another, موازنه / بده‌بستان ✅ Political capital: The trust or influence a politician can use to achieve goals, سرمایه سیاسی / نفوذ سیاسی ✅ Invest (resources) elsewhere: To use money or energy in another area, سرمایه‌گذاری در جای دیگر ✅ Valid point: A reasonable or logical argument, نکته درست و منطقی ✅ Constraints: Limits or restrictions, محدودیت‌ها ✅ In principle: As an idea or theory, not in practice, از نظر تئوری / اصولاً

نظرها