

شنیدن و نگهداشتن این اپیزود
پخش را شروع کن؛ هنگام رفتن به صفحههای دیگر هم ادامه پیدا میکند.
برای خواندن و مرور دوباره
گفتوگو را به متن همراهت تبدیل کن
متن کامل و خوانای این اپیزود در Word و PDF، همراه با نقشهٔ تصویری موضوعات.
کتابخانه و بازخورد
برای شناخت بهتر پیش از شنیدن
این اپیزود هنوز بررسی عمیق نشده است
در اپیزودهای بررسیشده، پادگرد خلاصه، محورهای گفتگو، فصلهای قابل پخش و پرسشهای مهم را از متن اپیزود استخراج میکند.
تحلیل این اپیزودتکمیل این اپیزود
اگر مهمان یا اسپانسری جا افتاده، از فهرست موجود انتخاب کن یا نام تازهای پیشنهاد بده. پیشنهادها بعد از بررسی مدیر عمومی میشوند.
متن منتشرشده توسط پادکستر
توضیحات اپیزود
I think it’s a ritual. A fun but arbitrary ritual—a ceremony that we perform out of habit. We imprinted on it when we were young and impressionable, or were new to a city and looking for esprit de corps. Sure, there are moments where team loyalty does matter in our lives: it allows us to high-five acquaintances at bars and hug strangers at victory parades. It gives us a sense of solidarity. If you reflect on it, though, hating an opposing team is an accident of birth. If you had been born in New York instead of Boston, would you really hate the Yankees? For our third approach, Tim and I recruited fans of the Red Sox and Yankees. To prove their allegiance, they had to correctly name one of their team’s players from a photo—and the last year his team had won the World Series. Then we took some steps to open their minds. First, to help them recognize the complexity of their own beliefs, we asked them to list three positives and three negatives about fans of the opposing team. You saw the most common negatives earlier, but they were able to come up with some positives, too: Then we randomly assigned half of them to go the extra step of reflecting on the arbitrariness of their animosity: Think and write about how Yankee fans and Red Sox fans dislike each other for reasons that are fairly arbitrary. For example, if you were born into a family of fans of the rival team, you would likely also be a fan of them today. To gauge their animosity toward their opponents, we gave them a chance to decide how spicy the hot sauce sold in the rival team’s stadium should be. The backstory was that consumer product researchers were planning to do taste tests of hot sauces in baseball stadiums. People who were randomly assigned to reflect on the arbitrariness of their stereotypes selected less fiery hot sauce for their rival’s stadium. We also gave them a chance to sabotage a rival fan’s performance on a timed, paid math test by assigning harder problems, and those who considered the arbitrariness of their stereotypes picked easier questions for the rival fan. People weren’t just more sympathetic toward a single fan—they changed their views toward their rival team as a whole. They were less likely to see their rival’s failure as their success, their rival’s success as a personal insult, and criticism of their rival as a personal compliment. And they were more likely to support their rival team in ways that would normally be unthinkable: wearing the rival team’s jerseys, sitting in its dugout at games, voting for its players in the AllStar Game, and even endorsing the team on social media. For some fans, it was almost like breaking a religious code, but their comments made it clear that they were rethinking their stances: I think it is pretty dumb to hate someone just based on the sports teams they enjoy supporting. Thinking about that makes me want to reconsider how I feel about some supporters of teams that I dislike. If someone hated me because of the team that I loved, it would feel unfair. Almost like a form of prejudice because they are judging me based on one thing about me and hating me for that reason. After feeling these thoughts, I may change the way I interact with Red Sox fans. The team they support is not necessarily indicative of who they are. Even though they are wrong. We’d finally made some progress. Our next step was to examine the key ingredients behind the shift in fans’ views. We found that it was thinking about the arbitrariness of their animosity—not the positive qualities of their rival—that mattered. Regardless of whether they generated reasons to like their rivals, fans showed less hostility when they reflected on how silly the rivalry was. Knowing what it felt like to be disliked for ridiculous reasons helped them see that this conflict had real implications, that hatred for opposing fans isn’t all fun and games. 📱 Instagram: Luminous__english ✅ Website : lumilearn.ir Castbox channel: آموزش زبان با پادکست ◀️اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد دوره ها: ◀️آیدی تلگرام @ad_lumi ◀️آیدی بله foroughp ✔️کانال بله: lumilearn 📚 هایلایت قسمت 90 کتابThink Again ✅ out of habit – از روی عادت doing something automatically because you are used to it ✅ impressionable (young) – تأثیرپذیر (بهخصوص در سن پایین) easily influenced by others ✅ sense of solidarity – حس همبستگی a feeling of unity and support among people ✅ accident of birth – اتفاقِ تولد / چیزی که انتخاب ما نیست something determined only by where or to whom you are born ✅ recruit fans – جذب کردن هواداران to get people to join or participate in something ✅ prove allegiance – اثبات وفاداری to show loyalty or commitment to a group or team ✅ open their minds – باز کردن ذهن / تغییر دیدگاه to make someone more willing to consider new ideas ✅ come up with – مطرح کردن / پیدا کردن (ایده) to think of or produce an idea or solution ✅ reflect on – تأمل کردن / فکر کردن درباره to think carefully and deeply about something ✅ gauge animosity – سنجیدن میزان دشمنی to measure how strong negative feelings are ✅ less fiery (hot sauce) – کمتندتر (سس) not very spicy or hot ✅ sabotage performance – خراب کردن عملکرد to deliberately make someone perform worse ✅ as a whole – بهطور کلی considering everything together ✅ be likely to – احتمال داشتن to probably do something ✅ rethink their stance – بازنگری در موضع / دیدگاه to reconsider or change one’s opinion or position
نظرها
هنوز نظری نوشته نشده.


